OTC SquawkOTC Squawk
Log inSign up
OTC SquawkOTC Squawk
Log inSign up
FeedDiscoverTickersNotificationsProfileSign in to squawk

OTC Squawk is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OTC Markets Group Inc. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Back to feed
  1. 1/4
    @Small_Time_Tina
    Small Time Tina@Small_Time_Tina·20 days ago

    So these are not OTC but I have them on watch because I was looking for tickers that may go to OTC due to the new rule. But what ended up happening was I ended up with a list of potential movers because the SEC just hit pause on Nasdaq's new delisting rule.

    How it started:

    Quick background: on July 22 the SEC approved a rule that kicks any company off Nasdaq if its market value stays under $5 million for 30 straight trading days. No grace period. Over 200 companies were on the clock.

    On July 29 the SEC stayed its own order. A party asked the full Commission to review it, and under their rules that freezes everything. The clock stopped.

    12
  2. 2/4
    @Small_Time_Tina
    Small Time Tina@Small_Time_Tina·20 days ago

    What I was doing before the rule was paused:

    I screened all 218 names. Cut the crypto treasury plays, the death-spiral preferred structures, and anything already flagged deficient on another listing rule. Then I checked filings on the survivors.

    Here's what surprised me: most of the big drops in July were NOT short sellers betting on delisting. They were companies printing new shares. Short interest on most of these is under 1%. There's nobody to squeeze. Everyone would assume short sellers crushed these stocks. I checked. That's not what happened.

    Here's the part nobody's talking about. I pulled volume on 124 of these names, before and after the rule.

    Volume didn't spike. It collapsed. The typical name traded at less than half its normal volume. Two-thirds saw volume fall by 20% or more.

    That signature is buyers withdrawing, not sellers attacking. Short pressure produces falling prices on rising volume. Falling prices on collapsing volume means the bid simply left — market makers widened, buyers stepped back from the whole category, and thin selling walked prices down through empty books.

  3. 3/4
    @Small_Time_Tina
    Small Time Tina@Small_Time_Tina·20 days ago

    What does that mean?

    Sellers attacking a stock creates heavy volume. This was the opposite, prices bled out on almost no volume at all. That's not sellers piling in. That's buyers walking away. Nobody wanted to catch a stock that might get delisted in 30 days, so the bids just disappeared and thin selling walked prices down through an empty book.

    That changes what the stay means. This isn't a short squeeze setup because squeezes are fast and violent. This is buyers slowly deciding it's safe to come back. Much slower. Much less certain. But can cause a spike

  4. 4/4
    @Small_Time_Tina
    Small Time Tina@Small_Time_Tina·· edited

    So what came of all this?

    So I'm not playing a bounce. I'm watching 7 names that have something real but started to bleed out because buyer left when the rule was announced:

    $BNRG — lender waived a loan payment, negotiating a discounted payoff. Debt going down, not shares going up.

    $MNDR — signed a real joint venture in Ghana. Watch the $300M ATM though.

    $SXTP — trial data readout due by October 6. Hard date, real binary.

    $BKYI — Central Bank of Jordan deal, already back in compliance. Going concern flag is the risk.

    $ERNA (Ernexa Therapeutics) — zero dilution or compliance language across three filings

    $JZXN (Jiuzi) — same, clean across three

    $ELAB (PMGC Holdings) — merger/acquisition language three separate times, zero dilution language. Acquiring rather than raising is the rarest pattern in this entire cohort.

    Rule pause may signal buyers to come back.

    BullishBearish
    1

Reply

Sign in to reply and see the full conversation.

Follow traders, track your tickers, and squawk your own calls.

Sign upLog in

Replies

1
  • @Small_Time_Tina
    Small Time Tina@Small_Time_Tina·15 days ago
    As of today almost all of them have motion😀
    ReplyReport